Sunday, March 3, 2024
Sunday, March 3, 2024
Home » Theresa May Says Asylum Plan Won’t Solve Illegal Migration Issue

Theresa May Says Asylum Plan Won’t Solve Illegal Migration Issue

by Freddy Evans
0 comment 92 views


Government plans to tackle small boat crossings will not solve the issue of illegal migration, former Prime Minister Theresa May has warned.

Under the proposals, modern slavery victims would be “collateral damage” and denied support, she told MPs.

Several other Tories also called for changes to the Illegal Migration Bill.

However it passed its first Commons hurdle, with the home secretary saying it was “a humane attempt” to break the incentive for people-smuggling gangs.

Suella Braverman said the number of people crossing the Channel had “overwhelmed our asylum system” and “our capacity to help people is not unlimited”.

The new legislation, announced last week, aims to stop migrants making the dangerous journey to the UK in small boats – which Prime Minister Rishi Sunak made one of his five key priorities.

Under the plans, anyone found to have entered the country illegally would be removed from the UK within 28 days, and also be blocked from returning or claiming British citizenship in future. They would either be returned to their home country, or another “safe third country” like Rwanda.

The bill passed its second reading in the Commons by 312 votes to 250, with the majority of Tory MPs voting for the plans.

No Conservatives voted against, although Mrs May and former ministers Chris Skidmore and Caroline Nokes, who have been publicly critical of the bill, were among those who did not register a vote, according to the Parliament website.

Critics say the proposals break international law and they are likely to face opposition in the House of Lords, as well as legal challenges in the courts.

During a debate on the bill in the Commons, Mrs May told MPs that “whenever you close a route, the migrants and the people smugglers find another way, and anybody who thinks that this bill will deal with the issue of illegal migration once and for all is wrong”.

She raised several concerns about the proposed legislation, including that anyone fleeing persecution who came to the UK via an illegal route would face a “blanket dismissal”.

“By definition, someone fleeing for their life will more often than not be unable to access a legal route,” she said.

Mrs May also highlighted the potential impact of the bill on victims of modern slavery, saying “as it currently stands we are shutting the door on victims while being trafficked into slavery here in the UK”.

“If they come here illegally they will not be supported to escape their slavery,” she added.

The former home secretary said No 10 had offered to discuss her concerns about the bill and she hoped “we can find some resolution”.

Another senior Conservative MP, Sir Robert Buckland, said he had “great concern” about a clause of the bill which could allow children to be detained.

The former justice secretary also warned that the “tone” used by some members of his party was “not appropriate” and “we have to do better”.

While he said he would vote for the bill, Tory MP Simon Hoare said he wanted to see changes in relation to women who are trafficked and children.

Other Tories, including Mr Skidmore, said they could not support the bill.

The former minister wrote on Twitter: “I am not prepared to break international law or the human rights conventions that the UK has had a proud history of playing a leading role in establishing.”

And Ms Nokes, the Conservative chairwoman of the Commons women and equalities committee, said she had “absolute horror” at the prospect of the bill.

“I am deeply troubled at the prospect of a policy which seeks to criminalise children, pregnant women, families and remove them to Rwanda,” the former immigration minister told Times Radio.

However, other Conservative MPs were supportive of the government’s approach.

Former minister Sir John Hayes said people wanted “tough action” on illegal immigration.

“Of course Britain should provide a safe haven for people in need, in genuine need,” he said. “But it is a deceit to pretend the asylum system is not being gamed and the British people taken for a ride.”

Marco Longhi, who represents Dudley North, said the bill would act as a deterrent for people undertaking “very perilous journeys”.

Labour voted against the bill, describing it as “a con that makes the chaos worse”.

Shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper said “it won’t stop the criminal gangs or dangerous crossings” but “it will rip up our long-standing commitment to international law”, as well as “lock up children” and “remove support and safe refuges from women who have been trafficked”.

The SNP also opposed the bill, saying there was no proof it would work and it would “create an underclass of people stuck in immigration limbo indefinitely”.

Chart showing the number of people crossing the English Channel in boats (March 2023)

Defending the plans, Ms Braverman said unaccompanied children would only be removed from the UK under limited circumstances, such as for the purposes of family reunion.

“Otherwise, they will be provided with the necessary support in the UK until they reach 18,” she told MPs.

Responding to concerns about families and pregnant women, she said “we must not create incentives for the smugglers to focus on people with particular characteristics by signposting exemptions for removal”.

Closing the debate, Immigration Minister Robert Jenrick said the government was “committed to tackling the heinous crime of modern slavery and supporting victims”.

“It’s for that reason that we want to prevent abuse [of the system],” he added.

Source: British Broadcasting Corporation

You may also like

Yew Media is a global leader in the online news. We seek to inform and engage with our readers. Staffed 24 hours, seven days a week by a dedicated team around the globe, we deliver news from journalists around the world. We are contrarian truth-seekers and truthtellers. We are journalists united by a mission to inform and engage with our readers. We bear witness to history as it unfolds and explain not just what happened, why it happened and what it means to our readers and the public. We are contrarian, we are committed to the news, speaking truth to power.

Yew Media, A Media Company – All Right Reserved.